Freeze the evidence
Fix sources, versions, dates and provenance before assessment begins.
Independent policy research · Bosnia and Herzegovina
ARM Policy Lab turns financial records, legal procedure and institutional conduct into audit-ready diagnostics for reform, oversight and public-interest action.
The institute
ARM Policy Lab is an independent platform for applied research on institutional accountability, rule of law, EU integration and industrial transition. It focuses on the implementation gap: the distance between formal rules and what institutions actually do.
Our work combines forensic accounting, procedural reconstruction and structured evidence analysis. The result is not advocacy by assertion, but a record that another analyst, institution or court can independently test.
Method
The framework is designed to make every analytical transition visible and challengeable.
Fix sources, versions, dates and provenance before assessment begins.
Separate fact, legal proposition, expert inference and unresolved allegation.
Ask whether the record supports the proposed conclusion and competing explanations.
Connect mandate, knowledge, action, omission and institutional consequence.
State what is proved, what is inferred and what remains unknown.
Current work
Each program links a defined public problem to a reproducible analytical method and a usable policy output.
A structured model for testing exposure, institutional response and implementation failure across complex governance cases.
A dual-control model for testing whether the evidentiary record and the reasoning of a decision remain mutually verifiable.
A technical accountability architecture combining management certification, internal controls and independent oversight.
Diagnostics of the gap between reform commitments, institutional delivery and measurable public outcomes.
Financial and governance analysis of decarbonization exposure, disclosure quality and transition risk.
Case-based policy diagnostics
The Zenica case study examines the reporting of financial irregularities, a court-confirmed unlawful dismissal, subsequent institutional responses and procedural inconsistencies. The purpose is not to replace adjudication, but to identify where protection, oversight and enforcement mechanisms cease to function as a coherent system.
Outputs
Clear evidentiary boundaries, documented assumptions and practical pathways for institutional action.
Chronologies, evidence indexes, claim matrices and contradiction maps.
Mandate-to-conduct testing across institutions and reform frameworks.
Focused recommendations for public authorities, EU actors and oversight bodies.
Replicable methods, scoring systems, validation plans and decision rules.
Lead expertise
Forensic policy analyst · Certified accountant · Independent researcher
The Lab is led from the intersection of financial reporting, evidentiary analysis and direct experience with judicial and institutional processes. This combination enables research that follows both the numbers and the procedure.
View professional profile ↗Collaboration
ARM Policy Lab is open to joint research, donor-funded projects and technical collaboration with civil society, EU and international institutions, academic partners and oversight bodies.
Start a conversationpolicylab@policylab.racunovodstvo-arm.ba
Zenica / Sarajevo · Bosnia and Herzegovina